STRATEGIC APPROACH TO CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

Ljiljana Kontić

Abstract


The main aim of this paper is to emphasize strategic approach to corporate social responsibility based on analysis of relevant theories. In the relevant literature, there are many approaches to corporate social responsibility, but the following theories will be presented: agency theory, stakeholder theory, institutional theory, resource-based view of firm, theory of the firm, and strategic leadership theory. There are numerous unresolved issues relating to the corporate social responsibility, which include defining concept, identifying institutional differences in corporate social responsibility across countries, modeling, determining the motivations, implementing strategies, exploring effects of leadership and corporate culture, and measuring performance of corporate social responsibility. Corporate social responsibility can be regarded as engagement of firm beyond the economic, technological, and legal requirements in order to fulfill social and environmental benefits along with traditional economic performance. In this manner, corporate social responsibility can be analyzed on different levels. One of the best-known models, corporate social responsibility pyramid, presents company’s social obligations as comprising economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities. To respond to societal expectations and allocate resources, top managers must first identify relevant corporate social responsibility issues so that they can develop their strategic agenda. Incorporating corporate social responsibility into corporate-level strategies can be realized through linking with following six dimensions: mission, strategic issues, markets, customer needs, resources, and competitive advantage. Corporate executives should take the lead role in this process. When corporate social responsibility became integral part of business strategy, then strategic corporate social responsibility can contributed to good management practice, economic benefit, and societal welfare.


Keywords


corporate social responsibility, strategy, economic theory, Serbia, European Union

Full Text:

PDF (Serbian)

References


Baron, D. (2001). “Private politics, corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10, pp. 7-45.

Business for Social Responsibility (2003). Overview of corporate social responsibility, BSR Issue Brief, available at http://www.bsr.org/insight/issue-briefdetails

Calabrese, A., & Lancioni, F. (2008). “Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Service Sector: Does Exist a Strategic Path?” Knowledge and Process Management 15/2, pp. 107-125.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders” Business Horizons 34, pp. 39-49.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, Lee E. (1995). “The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications” Academy of Management Review 20/1, pp. 65-91.

European Commission (2001). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Green Paper, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Freeman, E. R. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Friedman, M. (1970). “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits” New York Times Magazine, September 13.

Galbreath, J. (2009). “Building corporate social responsibility into strategy” European Business Review 21/2, pp. 109-127.

Hart, S. (1995) “A natural resource-based view of the firm” Academy of Management Review 20, pp. 986–1014.

Jennings, P., & Zandbergen, P. (1995). “Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach”. Academy of Management Review, 20, pp. 1015–1052.

Lantos, G. P. (2002). “The ethicality of altruistic corporate social responsibility” Journal of Consumer Marketing 19, pp. 205-228.

Levitt, T. (1958). “The dangers of social responsibility” Harvard Business Review, September-October, p. 47.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). “Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective Academy of Management Review 26/1, pp. 117-127.

McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. (2006). “Corporate social responsibility- Strategic implication”, Journal of Management Studies 43/1, pp. 1-18.

Mullen, J. (1997). “Performance-based corporate philanthropy: how ‘giving smart’ can further corporate goals” Public Relations Quarterly Summer, pp. 42-48.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). “The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy” Harvard Business Review 80/12, pp. 56-68.

Waddock, S., & Bodwell, C. (2004). “Managing responsibility: What can be learned from the quality movement”. California Management Review, 47/1, pp. 25–38.

Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., & Javidan, M. (2004). “CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility” Working paper Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.